Are you making the transition to using Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) as the guiding document in your science classroom? Making the transition to thinking the NGSS way may definitely be a change. The document asks educators to engage students in rigorous thinking enabling them to share arguable evidence while engaged in the science and engineering practices. Perhaps it is a new thought process for your teaching practices, but if you are a self contained elementary teacher, then you are very used to teaching this way in English Language Arts and Mathematics. The standards in those disciplines have been asking teachers to challenge students by engaging them in rigorous thinking and having them share evidence of their findings. To learn more about “how to” read the document, use this link.
I really enjoy how the NGSS document has been constructed. The Performance Expectations state the goals of the standards by embedding the Crosscutting Concepts, Disciplinary Core Ideas (DCI), and the Science and Engineering Practices within them. An additional tool educators can rely on are the evidence statements found in the NGSS document.
These evidence statements might be described as the “unpacking” of the Performance Expectations (PEs), which describe what students should know and be able to do at the end of an area of instruction. Because the goal of instruction is not to “teach” the PEs, but rather to give students rich experiences that would allow them to meet or exceed what is written in the PEs after classroom experiences. Most importantly, tasks should focus on developing students’ three-dimensional understanding and practice in meaningful ways. In assessment and especially in instruction, varied and rich experiences should be developed that may differ from the exact performance expectations, but remain congruent with the intent and expectations of the NGSS.
Evidence statements were not intended to be used as a sequential list. They give educators information about what to look for in student performance at the end of instruction. Students might demonstrate the ‘last’ piece of an evidence statement (e.g., the ‘connections’ of a model, ‘reasoning and synthesis’ of an argument) as their primary communication. Teachers can then look for other parts of the evidence statements in what students do. For example, if students provide an argument with reasoning and synthesis, the claim, evidence, and evaluation may be embedded in the reasoning and synthesis, rather than being called out separately.
I like the Next Generation Science Standards document. Becoming more familiar with it and learning how to use it, is a process. I’m up for the challenge of adding it to my learning curve. I bet you are too!!
Happy Spring! Yes, this is a picture of my niece, I thought it was appropriate being that it is the beginning of spring and she is using her finger to help her explore one of the wonders of Spring. . . a ladybug! Part 1 of “Fingers as Math Tools” (Chris please link “Part 1… Continue Reading
In my previous blog, I talked about a composite unit, what it is and how it plays an important role in many different aspects of students’ construction of mathematics. One of these areas is fractions. So how does the student’s ability to take a number as something that is countable affect their understanding of fractions?… Continue Reading
Narrator: “Although this series makes this interaction seem like a long period of time, it was actually only about 3 minutes…well, maybe 5! Time flies when you’re having fun, okay? Anyway, can Bob count two hidden piles of rocks? Let’s get back to the action.” (Math research associate narrates…) RA: So it was the bottom… Continue Reading
The daily use of spatial skills is inherent in everyday life. From arranging furniture in the living room to stacking food in the pantry, spatial ability is a necessary skill we practice on a regular basis. It is also how we navigate within the world. Long before there was MapQuest or Siri on your iPhone,… Continue Reading
Joining Chris in the studio this week is Paul Reimer, a Sr. Researcher at the AIMS Center working with our Early Mathematics studies. Paul is also a student in the Michigan State University Doctoral Program, studying the effects of teacher beliefs on student learning. We discuss his studies and how they connect with our work here at the AIMS Center.
Who do you rely on professionally? I could name a long list of people, places, journals, periodicals, podcasts, and websites, but most recently I listened to my colleague Chris Brownell’s recent podcast with Director of Special Education Studies at Fresno Pacific University, Megan Chaney. Megan is doing her doctoral research on teachers dispositions and she… Continue Reading
A few weeks ago, I saw a post of some students dancing and singing to a set of procedures for solving a long division problem. The person who shared the video raved about how she had never seen students love math so much. Several of my friends responded by saying that they didn’t love math,… Continue Reading
As the early math team moves forward on the work we are doing, the concept of practicality is an issue we are addressing. One-on-one interviews with the children have taught us a wealth of information about young children’s mathematics, but it is not a realistic structure that early childhood teachers have time to do in… Continue Reading
Which is bigger 5/6 or 7/8? If the answer isn’t popping into your head in seconds, you are not alone. Fractions are one of the most misunderstood concepts among both young and old in mathematics. They don’t seem to follow the same rules as whole numbers. Many of us purposely never work with fractions at… Continue Reading