Constructivism and More
The power of play is a foundational idea in education, especially in regards to young children. It is something I have been thinking about a lot lately within the context of spatial learning. Seymour Papert, who passed away in 2016, was a visionary in the field of education and was a huge proponent of the importance of play in the classroom. Papert was a mathematician, computer scientist, and educator who collaborated for a time with Jean Piaget at the University of Geneva in Switzerland. For most of his career he worked closely with Mitch Resnick at the MIT Media Labs. He is considered one of the leaders of the constructionist movement in education and was a pioneer in artificial intelligence. A man truly ahead of his time, many of the popular ideas in education such as problem-based learning, the significance of student collaboration, and how technology is changing student learning environments were developed out of ideas from Seymour Papert and the MIT Media Labs.
Papert strongly believed in the transformative power of play both in and out of the classroom environment. Interestingly enough, the word “play” often has many different and varied meanings when described by people within the educational community. Play in the classroom is often described negatively as carefree, chaotic, and without structure or substance. But Papert, on the other hand, would go on to describe the more positive driven idea of “hard play”. He believed that children should be challenged through discovery and exploration of real world problems that have a personal significance to them. That the act of play through discovery and design is essential for developing a child’s passion for problem solving and love of learning.
This is an idea that resonates deeply within me. Educating kids shouldn’t be about rote learning or a teacher’s direct transfer of information. It should be about getting kids to fall passionately in love with learning new ideas on a daily basis. We often, as teachers, are so caught up in the minutia of state standards, content coverage, and classroom management that we sometimes forget that so many of these things we consider important become much easier if a child has developed a passion for learning. This sounds easy, doesn’t it? Don’t get me wrong, I am not condoning the idea of a “magic wand” that will suddenly transform education. There are too many variables involved in children’s learning to be able to find a simple solution to such a complex problem. But I believe that Papert’s vision of connecting play and passion in the classroom is timeless and is an idea worthy of pursuit within education.
The AIMS Center Research Associates who regularly post on this blog site are challenged to not only read, understand, and translate into practice research related to how children come to acquire knowledge of mathematics—specifically we are presently focused on how children acquire knowledge of number—but also to read and come to know the theoretical underpinnings… Continue Reading
It’s always fun when different experiences we are having converge to give each of them a new and deeper meaning. This happened to me this past week. Over the past couple of weeks, I’ve been reading a book and a couple of articles about the biological roots of human understanding by Humberto Maturana, who for… Continue Reading
This past weekend I heard a powerful, inspirational presentation by a wise, older gentleman, Mr. Janzen, who has been a college president, a pastor, and a counselor. He talked about three principles that have guided him through the years. He calls them the pi – pe – pa principles, where pi stands for powerful insights,… Continue Reading
As you read the various posts on this blog, you again and again hear the writers talking about how one child or another responded to a given question or a given situation. For example, a week or so ago Bev Ford in her post showed a video clip of Grace, a first grader, as she… Continue Reading
There are words that I come across in my reading that, while not unfamiliar, are words for which I have only a very cursory understanding. One such word which keeps coming up in relation to Piaget’s writing is the word, dialectic or dialectical or dialectical method. Recently, when once again it was front and center… Continue Reading
This blog post is being written from Tucson, Arizona, where Tiffany Friesen, Paul Reimer, and I are attending the annual conference of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. The approximately 600 men and women attending this conference are almost exclusively university professors along with their graduate students,… Continue Reading
My work with the AIMS team began last month after 20 years in public education, first as an elementary teacher and later as a mathematics coach. I have spent a lot of hours in TK-12 classrooms, walking alongside teachers as they explored ways to make their classrooms places where authentic mathematics learning could happen. In… Continue Reading
In previous blog posts we have, in various ways, talked about the commitment of the AIMS Center to a constructivist understanding of how children come to know. There are several reasons for this choice, but probably the most relevant is that the most significant and extensive research related to how children come to know whole… Continue Reading
Why? Why do you go to work daily? Why are you good at what you do? Why are you reading this mathematics blog? Why are students engaged in some math lessons and not others? Why do some students do well in school while some fall behind? I’m going to leave you, the reader, to answer… Continue Reading