The mathematics of students is a powerful tool for a teacher. It allows a teacher to hypothesize what is happening in the mind of a child and plan a next step that will allow that child to construct more sophisticated understanding. Today I want to look at the mathematics of a student we call Grace (pseudonym). I love telling Grace’s story because she moved from solving problems like 8+4 to 98+4 in our 6 week study!
When Grace was interviewed in December (2
015), we noticed that she could solve problems even when counters were not in front of her. She used her finger patterns to help her solve these problems. In my experience working with teachers before joining the AIMS Center, I would have described Grace’s behavior simply as she needed to use her fingers. I had no idea that how a child uses their fingers can be an indicator of very different understandings and mental material. Children use their fingers in a variety of ways to solve problems, and it is helpful when you can use the unique way they use their fingers to interpret their mathematical understandings. .
Please watch the following video and write down a few things that you notice.
Grace did not explain her process right away by using her fingers, but after a prompting from one of the research associates she explained her solution by using a simultaneous finger pattern (lifts all fingers at the same time) and then counting additional fingers. Let’s look at how she solved the first problem, which was seven under one cloth and four under a second cloth. She starts by lifting a finger pattern for seven simultaneously. Then she counts while lifting a finger every time she says a number, “1, 2, 3, 4.” She explains that the solution has to be eleven because she didn’t have enough fingers and had to imagine one more.
Grace is using her recognized finger pattern for seven to help her create something to count. She knows what ‘seven’ looks like on her fingers without having to count them one at a time. In the second problem she solves the problem in the same manner and even states that she solved it like the last problem. Did you notice that detail the first time you watched the video? Watch it again. Can you solve 8+5 using Grace’s method? We refer to mental images, movements, or words as “figurative material”. It is something the student generates (not concrete) to make it possible to solve the problem. Given that fact that she did this without her fingers being visible (they were under the table), I think Grace is definitely moving away from working with concrete material to working with figurative material. Students have to work with figurative material before they can construct abstract material. And constructing abstract material is the goal.
In my next few blog posts I will write about the limitation of this method that Grace used and I will show what tasks I presented her to foster opportunities to construct more sophisticated methods.
We know that children do not learn simply because we have given them information that we find to be important. And I hope that we know that just because we list the objectives on the board, cover each one with diligence, and check it off doesn’t mean that we have taught the objective. So what… Continue Reading
In my last blog, I reflected on my experience at the California Mathematics Council’s Southern Conference in Palm Springs and our presentation, “Don’t be Quick to Count On!”. Referenced throughout the conference were the Mathematics Teaching Practices from NCTM. One of these practices that resonates with the work of my team of research associates is,… Continue Reading
In my last blog I discussed the gap between using manipulatives and using numerals only as being a gap too large to traverse in one step. What then bridges the gap? Research that has been the focus of study at the AIMS Center suggests that the answer is to be found in the mathematical knowledge… Continue Reading
The latest results from international testing in mathematics have been released and results show the United States finished behind Kazakhstan. Now I don’t know much about Kazakhstan, except this is the country Borat hails from. I’m sure Kazakhstan is a beautiful country, but it doesn’t jump out with me as a math powerhouse. What does… Continue Reading
This month kicked off with a bang! It started with a trip to the beautiful Monterey Peninsula for the California Mathematics Council (CMC), North Section – Asilomar Conference 2016. If you have not been before, switch over to your calendar right now and mark off the first weekend of December for the conference. Then you… Continue Reading
Counting and adding seem like a such simple tasks to adults. We learned how to count and add so long ago that we don’t even remember the thinking that took place to make sense of these mathematical tasks. Here at the AIMS Center we are reading the research by Dr. Les Steffe that shows us… Continue Reading
Are there any dangers in training your students in the “strategy” of counting-on? After reading Dr. Les Steffe’s work, I would argue it is harmful. He calls counting-on a non-teachable scheme. This means that if you want counting-on to be meaningful for students you can present situations that would promote their construction of counting-on, but… Continue Reading
This has been a big week of learning; learning to know new people, learning to know more about my work, more about the community of research, and more about myself. I will start with the latter. I tend to believe that I have a steady stream of curiosity. Every kid loves to ask “why?” and,… Continue Reading
I had the opportunity to attend my first California Mathematics Council, Southern conference, in Palm Springs. The title of this year’s conference was “Sparking Deeper Understanding.” I headed out early the first morning of the conference with my notebook in hand, not really knowing what to expect. I have attended other conferences for different content… Continue Reading