The mathematics of students is a powerful tool for a teacher. It allows a teacher to hypothesize what is happening in the mind of a child and plan a next step that will allow that child to construct more sophisticated understanding. Today I want to look at the mathematics of a student we call Grace (pseudonym). I love telling Grace’s story because she moved from solving problems like 8+4 to 98+4 in our 6 week study!
When Grace was interviewed in December (2
015), we noticed that she could solve problems even when counters were not in front of her. She used her finger patterns to help her solve these problems. In my experience working with teachers before joining the AIMS Center, I would have described Grace’s behavior simply as she needed to use her fingers. I had no idea that how a child uses their fingers can be an indicator of very different understandings and mental material. Children use their fingers in a variety of ways to solve problems, and it is helpful when you can use the unique way they use their fingers to interpret their mathematical understandings. .
Please watch the following video and write down a few things that you notice.
Grace did not explain her process right away by using her fingers, but after a prompting from one of the research associates she explained her solution by using a simultaneous finger pattern (lifts all fingers at the same time) and then counting additional fingers. Let’s look at how she solved the first problem, which was seven under one cloth and four under a second cloth. She starts by lifting a finger pattern for seven simultaneously. Then she counts while lifting a finger every time she says a number, “1, 2, 3, 4.” She explains that the solution has to be eleven because she didn’t have enough fingers and had to imagine one more.
Grace is using her recognized finger pattern for seven to help her create something to count. She knows what ‘seven’ looks like on her fingers without having to count them one at a time. In the second problem she solves the problem in the same manner and even states that she solved it like the last problem. Did you notice that detail the first time you watched the video? Watch it again. Can you solve 8+5 using Grace’s method? We refer to mental images, movements, or words as “figurative material”. It is something the student generates (not concrete) to make it possible to solve the problem. Given that fact that she did this without her fingers being visible (they were under the table), I think Grace is definitely moving away from working with concrete material to working with figurative material. Students have to work with figurative material before they can construct abstract material. And constructing abstract material is the goal.
In my next few blog posts I will write about the limitation of this method that Grace used and I will show what tasks I presented her to foster opportunities to construct more sophisticated methods.
Hopefully last week you read the blog by Tiffany Friesen in which she discussed perturbation. In it, she gave a couple of examples from her own experience. Both of the situations that she mentioned were familiar enough to her that she had the capacity to resolve her confusion. She had familiarity with making the cookies… Continue Reading
Narrator: “Last time on Meet the Children Where They Are: Mr. Unnamed nerdy-looking stereotypical math Research Associate (RA) is down in the mud getting ready to do some math with an unsuspecting 5-year-old child named Bob. Can he find Bob’s ZPC without damaging the child for life? Let’s head back to the construction site where… Continue Reading
Understanding the mind of a child is a difficult if not impossible task and yet an elementary school teacher has the unenviable responsibility of doing just that in a classroom full of children. Historically, as far back as Aristotle, the human mind was thought to be an empty vessel just waiting to be filled with… Continue Reading
I am joined in the studio by four Research Associates from the AIMS Center for Math & Science Education. Elizabeth Gamino, Everett Gaston, Brook Lewis, and Aileen Rizo discuss some of the goals of this mode of teacher behavior, and provide a few strategies for its inclusion in the teacher repertoire. If you want to understand and assess the understandings that your students possess, you have to learn to notice how they communicate them.
Teachers must spend time collaborating, sharing experiences, and reflecting about what they are learning to assure deep, rich professional growth. Those who participate in long-term professional learning projects participate in and establish ways to collaborate, share, and reflect when meeting face to face. Equally important, are effective ways to do the same when some of… Continue Reading
We know that children do not learn simply because we have given them information that we find to be important. And I hope that we know that just because we list the objectives on the board, cover each one with diligence, and check it off doesn’t mean that we have taught the objective. So what… Continue Reading
When Dr. Thiessen first discussed his ideas about launching the AIMS Center for Math and Science Education with me, he suggested that our motto should be: “Know the Math; Know the Science; Know the Research.” And, he said, even more importantly, we can never forget that: “We believe in children’s knowledge!” I have been working… Continue Reading
Here at the AIMS Center, a central focus of our attention is the mathematical thinking of children. It should not be surprising that children do not think like adults. While as adults we agree in theory, our actions consistently seem to contradict this truth. The habitual act of laying our own mathematical thinking onto children… Continue Reading
The Fall semester (I have been in education so long I don’t see seasons as much as school terms), is one that is full of conferences and opportunities to reach out into the broader educational community. In my dual roles between AIMS and FPU, I end up at a significant number of conferences. This Fall… Continue Reading